Editorial policy
This Editorial Policy explains how Credit Plainly researches, writes, reviews, updates, and corrects educational credit content. Credit is a high-stakes consumer topic, so our pages should be careful, source-aware, and clear about limits.
Operator
CreditPlainly is operated by LEGITIME DOMAINS d.o.o., Ulica Stjepana Gradića 1, 10010 Zagreb, Croatia.
Mission
Credit Plainly exists to turn credit reports, disputes, scores, credit repair limits, monitoring, and credit-building concepts into plain-English education. The goal is to help readers understand their options, not to pressure them into a product or promise a result.
Editorial identity
Public educational guides are attributed to the Credit Plainly Editorial Team. This is an organization attribution, not a claim that every page was reviewed by a certified financial planner, attorney, credit counselor, mortgage professional, CPA, or other licensed professional.
Credit Plainly does not display "reviewed by", "expert reviewed", "legally reviewed", or "financially reviewed" unless that specific review is real, visible, and supported by verifiable credentials.
Topic scope
The site covers U.S. consumer-credit education, including credit reports, credit scores, credit report disputes, credit repair boundaries, identity theft issues related to reports, credit monitoring, credit-building basics, worksheets, checklists, and browser-based tools.
Source hierarchy
When practical, Credit Plainly starts with sources readers can verify:
- Official government and regulator materials, such as CFPB and FTC guidance.
- Relevant federal laws, regulations, and official agency pages where appropriate.
- Credit bureau materials when explaining bureau-specific processes.
- Provider or partner information only when clearly disclosed and relevant to the page.
- Established consumer education sources where official materials do not answer the practical question.
Source freshness and updates
Credit products, bureau policies, official guidance, prices, and partner terms can change. We update important pages when we become aware of material changes. We prefer to link to official sources for details that may change over time, such as dispute channels, eligibility rules, pricing, or legal deadlines.
A visible updated date should reflect a substantive content or source review, not a cosmetic refresh. If an original publication date is not known, the page should show only the updated date rather than guessing a published date.
How claims are written
Credit Plainly should use careful language such as "may", "can", "generally", "depends", "official sources say", and "check current terms" when the answer depends on facts outside the page. We avoid language that sounds like a promise, including guaranteed score increases, guaranteed approvals, guaranteed removals, credit hacks, loopholes, or claims that accurate negative information can simply be deleted.
YMYL caution
Credit decisions can affect housing, lending, employment screening, insurance, stress, and financial health. Content should not encourage rushed decisions, false disputes, unnecessary sharing of sensitive data, or reliance on a website instead of official sources or qualified professionals.
Credit Plainly does not provide personalized legal, tax, credit repair, or financial advice. It also does not guarantee score increases, deletion of accurate information, dispute outcomes, loan approval, mortgage approval, or credit-repair results.
AI and content production
AI tools may help draft, structure, summarize, or check content. Human editorial review is required before publication. Sources must not be fabricated. If a claim needs a source, the source should be verified rather than invented from memory.
Internal linking and related guides
Internal links should help readers move to the next useful guide, tool, or worksheet. Links should point to shipped, public pages and should not be used to push users toward a partner offer where an educational page is the better next step.
Affiliate separation
Affiliate revenue can exist, but it must not control factual claims. Partner links should be labeled in context, and review-style pages should explain limits, pricing considerations, cancellation issues, and who may not be a good fit. See the advertising disclosure.
Corrections process
Readers can report possible errors through our corrections policy. We review reasonable requests and prioritize issues that could materially affect a reader's understanding of rights, deadlines, safety, or important credit decisions.
Helpful reports include outdated bureau links, changed government forms, inaccurate procedural details, broken official links, changed contact information, and factual errors. We do not promise a fixed correction deadline.
Reader contact
Editorial questions can be sent through the contact page or by email at contact@creditplainly.com. Please do not send Social Security numbers, full account numbers, credit report uploads, or sensitive documents.
